<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>AI选型 on 如是有为</title><link>https://sensor.fans/tags/ai%E9%80%89%E5%9E%8B/</link><description>Recent content in AI选型 on 如是有为</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>zh</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2026 11:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sensor.fans/tags/ai%E9%80%89%E5%9E%8B/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>DeepSeek 选芯片：同一颗编码器，换份资料就可能换个排名</title><link>https://sensor.fans/posts/deepseek-encoder-ai-selection/</link><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2026 11:00:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://sensor.fans/posts/deepseek-encoder-ai-selection/</guid><description>&lt;section style="max-width:720px;margin:0 auto;background:#fff;padding:0 0 40px">
&lt;img src="https://sensor.fans/images/wx/deepseek-winverse-01.png" alt="DeepSeek与机器人编码器的技术插画" style="display:block;width:100%;height:auto"/>
&lt;div style="padding:22px 16px 0;color:#25374a;font-size:16px;line-height:1.95">
&lt;p>一颗芯片，电路没变，精度没变，价格也没变。只是往 DeepSeek 里多放了一份技术资料，它在推荐名单中的位置会不会发生变化？&lt;/p>
&lt;p>这个问题挺有意思。尤其是磁编码器这种产品，型号多、参数相似，规格书里却藏着大量不能直接横向比较的条件。&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>